On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:06:03 +0200 Simon Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got hit by this today. It was more amusing than frustrating but Glad you were amused. > since a friend pointed me to this bug, I'll spell out the current > silliness: > > The package "epiphany-browser" installs an executable named > "epiphany". The package "epiphany" installs an executable named > "epiphany-game". This is crazy. I propose that the "epiphany" be > renamed to "epiphany-game" and that the package "epiphany-broswer" be > left as is. Yeah, it's a so crazy situation that we have to maintain those packages from this psychiatric pavillion, it's terrific, isn't it? :-) By the way, the voices in my head tell me not to change package names just for fun ;-) > Renaming the "epiphany" executable to "epiphany-browser" would further > clarify things. You'll have to file a separate bug for that, but given the amount of "confused people" I see in this bug I think things are pretty clear. enjoy, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Ships are safe in harbor, but they were never meant to stay there.»
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
