On Mon, 06 Aug 2007, Andreas Barth wrote: > Actually, I think all these "solutions" have the same issue: > > There used to be a working process for the developers reference. > > Then someone came, tried to hijack it and now forces me to adjust my > process on the fly, while threatening me to ignore me in future again.
I've said things because I was angry. Please forgive me for that. I certainly won't ignore you, otherwise I wouldn't participate in the discussion and wouldn't try to make proposals that suit everybody. I also don't want to change the working process, although I'm interested in getting back my author/editor status. Thus I suggest the following: - I'll refrain from direct commits in the future, instead I'll open bug reports with patchs - you put me back in the Uploaders, and you accept me as an editor that can apply patches from the BTS. I won't apply them before the bug is at least 2 weeks old unless you explicitely voted in favor of the patch (in the bug log). Is that OK? > That is something I'm not going to accept. This is really driving me so > unhappy and frustrated that I consider currently to drastically reduce > my involvment in Debian, because it just annoys me totally. Please don't do so. > involved. But that only works if the person interested in joining shows > a minimal respect for the work of the lead maintainer, and that person's > style of work. Be sure that I respect all the work you did. Please also respect mine even if it dates back to a long time ago. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
