On Thu July 19 2007 03:58:58 am I wrote:
> On Thu July 19 2007 03:01:30 am you wrote:
> > or try the patch in #433386 against initscripts.
>
> I'll give it a try, and I expect it will work because so far the only
> success I've had is with this hack:
> -----
> --- /etc/init.d/portmap.orig        2007-07-19 01:11:51.000000000
> -0600 +++ /etc/init.d/portmap     2007-07-19 02:29:10.000000000 -0600
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
>             rm -f /var/run/portmap.state
>           fi
>         fi
> -
> +       /sbin/start-stop-daemon --start --oknodo --exec
> /sbin/rpc.statd ;;
>      stop)
>         log_begin_msg "Stopping portmap daemon..."
> -----
> which should have the same effect as the patch in #433386.

It didn't work as I expected.

- I applied the patch, reboot, no nfs mounted /usr.

- Did: "apt-get --reinstall install nfs-common initscripts"[1], to make 
sure I hadn't forgotten to revert any failed attempts and I was on the 
current page, reboot, no /usr.

- Went to apply the patch and found it was already applied (mostly, 
tried both with and without the initial "portmap=no" line), reboot, 
no /usr.

- re-hacked the portmap init script, reboot, all nfs imports are 
mounted.

I've had 6 sucessful boot using the portmap script hack above, ~12 
failures using the various hacks in the bug reports and trying to start 
rpc.statd at various points.


- Bruce

[1]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l nfs-common initscripts
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| 
Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: 
uppercase=bad)
||/ Name             Version          Description
+++-================-================-================================================
ii  initscripts      2.86.ds1-38      Scripts for initializing and 
shutting down the s
ii  nfs-common       1:1.1.0-11       NFS support files common to client 
and server


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to