Chris, Thanks for the bug report!
On 13 April 2005 at 12:18, Christian Hudon wrote: | Package: python-rpy-doc | Version: 0.4.1-2 | | The way the python-rpy-doc package is done now, it's not much more | useful than the rpy source package. There's just the raw texinfo source | together with a Makefile. It'd be nice if the texinfo source was | installed and registered with install-info so info browsers can see it. Indeed -- oversight on my part. | It'd also be nice if at least the HTML format (and maybe also the PDF | format for printing) was generated when building python-rpy-doc, and | installed under /usr/share/doc. Same here -- I obviously never did 'cd doc/ && make all' in debian/rules. Seems like I need to build these files and install them. If they are large maybe split them off into -html, -info and -pdf packages. Though maybe that's overkill... Any advice, Greg? Regards, Dirk -- Better to have an approximate answer to the right question than a precise answer to the wrong question. -- John Tukey as quoted by John Chambers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
