Thanks for replying. > On Thu, Jul 12, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> This is a test to see if I some how left out colon in last submission >> because this is the only way I can enter headers. >> >> apt-get install libpango1.0-dev complains about three dependancies and >> specifically that two of them are not in the sarge repository. > > Can you please followup to this bug with the "reportbug" tool?
> > Sarge should work just well, It has for a while, but I had stable in /etc/apt/sources.list and woops ran apt-get update. Woops, s/stable/sarge/ and apt-get upgrade/update and it is mostly working. Well, whatever I've put back. This all comes from wanting to get firefox and thunderbird working again. > libpango1.0-dev is installable in > sarge, you're probably mixing Debian repositories and end up with APT > errors. Well, apt-get install is the one that suggests the repositories are wrong. When I look at the three dependencies for libpango1.0-dev, it complains about the two I mentioned and indicates it wants prior version to what it can see. If I've changed /etc/apt/sources.list "back" to sarge, and run apt-get update, why would it be looking at the etch repository? I understand what you are saying. So where else in my confuguration would it be set? I thought it was all set in /etc/apt/sources.list > However, you should consider upgrading to the current stable > release of Debian: Etch. lol, Never use version 1.0. I prefer to wait until a new stable has been out at least six months before upgrading. I want to use linux, not be a system administrator. > > -- > Loïc Minier >
