On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 01:22:11AM +0200, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 07:16:43 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Resolving dependencies...
> Processing <>;[locales 2.6-2 -> {}, schroot 1.1.4-1 -> {schroot-common
> 1.1.4-1}];-200
> Trying to resolve locales 2.6-2 -> {} by installing locales 2.6-0exp3 from
> the dependency source
> Trying to resolve locales 2.6-2 -> {} by installing locales 2.5-11 from the
> dependency source
> Trying to resolve locales 2.6-2 -> {} by installing locales 2.5-9 from the
> dependency source
> Trying to resolve locales 2.6-2 -> {} by installing locales [UNINST] from the
> dependency source
> *** ERROR: search aborted by fatal exception. You may continue
> searching, but some solutions will be unreachable.
>
> Unexpectedly non-broken dependency schroot 1.1.4-1 -> {schroot-common
> 1.1.4-1}!
> (schroot-common 1.1.4-1 is installed)
> Abort.
Ooh, that's nasty. Apparently aptitude believes that the schroot
dependency is a broken dependency a priori. It gets the initial set
by scanning the cache for broken dependencies; I wonder if the new
apt version doesn't correctly manage the broken flag...
It probably is also relevant that this only happens with a command-line
upgrade AFAICT.
> > Also, if you could tar up and send the following files it would help
> > me reproduce this:
> >
> > * /var/lib/aptitude
> > * /var/lib/apt
> > * /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin
> > * /var/cache/apt/srcpkgcache.bin
> > * /etc/apt
> > * /var/lib/dpkg/status
> >
> Tarball uploaded to gluck.d.o:/home/jcristau/aptitude-432411.tar.bz2
OK, I can reproduce it with that. I'll try to get some time over the
weekend to take a look at this.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
