On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 09:20:23PM -0700, Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > I updated the package lists, and then started marking packages to upgrade with > '+'. I marked several openoffice.org-related packages to upgrade, which made > aptitude highlight the rest as broken because their dependencies require a > simultaneous uprade to the new version of all openoffice.org-related packages. > I hit 'e' to examine the recommended resolution, and it said: > --\ Upgrade the following packages: > > openoffice.org-filter-binfilter [2.2.1-4 now -> 2.2.1-5 unstable, > unstable] > openoffice.org-gcj [2.2.1-4 now -> 2.2.1-5 unstable, > unstable] > openoffice.org-gnome [2.2.1-4 now -> 2.2.1-5 unstable, > unstable] > openoffice.org-gtk [2.2.1-4 now -> 2.2.1-5 unstable, > unstable] > python-uno [2.2.1-4 now -> 2.2.1-5 unstable, > unstable] > I then hit '!' to apply these changes. Aptitude marked python-uno and > openoffice.org-filter-binfilter for upgrade, but marked the other three > packages for removal.
Were they listed as being unused packages? Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
