* Santiago Vila: > + file. Packages should not refer to GPL and LGPL symlinks in > + that directory since different, incompatible versions of these > + licenses have been published by the Free Software Foundation, > + hence using the symlinks could lead to ambiguity. > > I disagree with this. It should be ok to point to the latest version > of the GPL if the program says "Version X or later". Many programs > do that, and we should not need to change them.
But do we really want to license everything which is "GPL version 2 or later" under the GPL version 3? And how do we discriminate between "GPL version 2 or later" and "GPL version 3 or later"? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
