* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-12 14:32]: > Indeed. Right now, lexgrog is not even close to being able to parse > *roff at this level. Even if I were to implement that, other > implementations of whatis can't handle this either.
Well, if you do the correct parse at the mandb, then we should not bother about the different implementations of whatis, should we? > For portability, you should avoid constructs like that in the NAME > section. In this case, the Pod::Man module should be changed to avoid the inclusion of "special" constructs in the NAME section. I personally find this choice sub-optimal, because those markups are useful in the man pages. I guess we are stuck with this bug report... -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
