On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:44:52PM +0200, Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW, its not the (mis-) feature that bugged me so much but the, well,
> > bullshit explanation of what bash does and does not do. I simply explained
> > what it is in clear words, as there was no logic involved in the original
> > argument.
>
> The explanation was what I did to look into how I can accomodate my and
> your wish.
And the explanation was, in one word: wrong.
> Not sure what triggered you,
Just the fact that you gave illogical reasoning "triggered" me. Sorry if that
is a problem for you, but it will happen again. If you want to avoid this in
the future, you have to think about your arguments a bit more carefully
without makign broad, general, but unfortunately wrong, statements.
> didn't want or the fact that I am not interested to disable the feature by
> default.
I am not conerned about that as long as debian has a version of dstat that
doesn't do this, as I explained. I could probably/hopefully work around by
using a diferent TERM, too (haven't tested this), as I already have to use a
wrapper around dstat. And as I said, none of the bugs I personally suffer
from have been fixed, so I do not win anything from uograding, either.
So no, no problem with that for me at the moment. It is all perfectly fine
what you want to do, or not do.
--
The choice of a
-----==- _GNU_
----==-- _ generation Marc Lehmann
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / http://schmorp.de/
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE
