On 12/06/07 at 22:49 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > At 1181680337 time_t, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Would you accept such a package, or do you prefer to keep the tetrinetx > > sources as close from upstream as possible ? > > I'd accept. But please, if you can put it into mainline, it's even > better. :)
Is upstream still alive ? > Nevertheless, if you can send several patches instead of one big, it > would be easier for me to used it. Well the tetrifast patch is quite small if I remember correctly. The other patches are clearly too intrusive, it would be better to fork tetrinetx instead, but I don't have the motivation for that. Actually, I just found out that the code was released on http://sourceforge.net/projects/tetrinetx-ng/, but nobody ever made anything with it. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
