On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 10:11:58AM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > > Thanks for the quick answer. I don't have a better solution for > #414391, if you don't like the one proposed by the submitter with the > relevant patch, I'd propose to leave it open for now. > > The important thing at the moment is to fix #403567, which renders the > package unusable on some amd64 CPUs. > > Ciao!
I didn't upload new version because I wanted find a solution for #414391
before, but, you have right, I will try to upload the new upstream in
the next days, without this patch, and I will upload another version of package
when I would have find a good solution to solve #414391.
Thanks for you help.
Regards
--
.---. Ludovic RESLINGER
/ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@./ Trumpet Student in CNR
/`\_/`\ Free Software Developer
// )X( \\
| \ : )|_ _,'| .''`.
/`\_`> <_/ \ @======TTT=====::_ | : :' :
\__/'---'\__/ ((_<=HHH___)) `.| `. `'`
`---UUU---'=> `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
