On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 11:39:52AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > Both are improvements, since they aren't actively misleading. They > remain a bit cryptic, though acl_local_deny_exceptions does convey the > semantics as I understand it. Is acl_local_blacklist_exceptions too > narrow a name, i.e., does this setting affect more than the local > blacklist?
There is more than one blacklist. It also exempts from sender and recipient verification (both via DNS and via callout), from the local blacklists, a message from header syntax checks and header senders from verification. It is enough for a message to have a sender on the exception list or to come in from a host listed on the exception list for the exception to hold. Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 3221 2323190 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
