On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:06:32PM +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote: > I had no idea, before, that the samba file used in D-I was a debconf > template. Thanks for explaining that. I won't need to keep an eye on > it on the debconf page anymore, since the D-I stats are emailed to me.
Yeah, any of the .po files from d-i are the debconf templates. > >So do you know any reason we would want to use one version over the > >other, > >or should I have a look at them both and take whichever is based on > >the more > >current source? > Pick either one: I think they're pretty much the same. I grabbed one > from the D-I pages on Alioth, and the other from the debconf page. :) I've compared the files that you sent, and although the source strings match, which means each of the translations is complete, the translations in each file are different. Since I don't speak Vietnamese, I would rather not have to choose between them myself; could you please review the differences between the two files and let me know which one you would prefer that we use? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
