Robert Griffin wrote:
> The backtrace wasn't *that* unhelpful. See mhash bug #1721000 "0.9.9  
> - alignment issue":
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? 
> func=detail&aid=1721000&group_id=4286&atid=104286
>   

Just as I suspected: an issue with whirlpool in libmhash on Sparc.
Thanks for clearing that up.

Sincerely,

Richard van den Berg



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to