On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 20:54 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Package: ion3 > Severity: normal > > The debconf templates used in that package really sound like debconf abuse > to me.
See my comment in the postinst.
> I don't think that debconf has been designed for such questions which sound
> like a legal nonsense to me. I suspect they may have been driven by
> discussions with upstream but, really, debconf is not meant for this.
There are other non-free packages that require the user to acknowledge
some "agreement". Is it really worse to use debconf for this, where the
text is short?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
- Albert Einstein
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
