On Tuesday 29 May 2007 17:08, Marc Sherman wrote: > Have you decided if you want to do this? The thread on > [EMAIL PROTECTED] seemed mostly for the idea, and there was > subsequently another thread on the same list about the related package > dkim-milter that seemed to agree with that assessment.
I'm rather indifferent to libmail-dkim-perl being added to volatile. However, I don't feel very much like going through the changes from the version in etch and picking out some minimum set instead of simply putting in a recent upstream version. Furthermore, the DKIM RFC is finished now, so there probably won't be much need for more than one upload to volatile (or volatile-sloppy). -- Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpnwSS01YEyr.pgp
Description: PGP signature