> > Yes, I think patching the HTML files would be OK.
> > 
> > Another option would be not compressing pdf files; but that's got a
> > disadvantage in that PDF files are not compressed.
> 
> After having considered the first option, and after having tried to
> customize dh_compress call (which is quite uneasy, due to some
> limitations in this tool), I'd rather go for uncompressed PDF files.

hmm? dh_compress -X looked like a very simple option to use.

> 
> Rationales for this are:
>  1. This is a separate documentation package.
>  2. Used space grows up from less than 1 MB to less than 2 MB, which
>     looks acceptable enough.
>  3. It makes users' life easier.
>  4. See #375406 and #367697, plaintext documentation is particularly
>     spotted as being subject to compression.
> 
> This behaviour has been commited in git.


Anyway, I'm fine.


regards,
        junichi
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to