Hi Ludovic!
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:22:16 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Le 24.05.2007, à 14:12:50, Luca Capello a écrit:
>> I think the title of the bug is the best solution, because:
>>
>> 1) pcsc-tools needs pcscd to works
>
> We do not agree on this.
So, as I already said in one of my reply [1], feel free to leave the
situation as it is.
However, I don't understand why adding a single Depends: on a package
which *anyway* is necessary could worse the situation.
>> 3) similar to point 2), libpcsclite1 doesn't necessarily need pcscd
>
> How would libpcsclite1 work without pcscd?
>
>> [1] but not that I'm aware of neither I'm a PC/SC expert
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Mmm, I'm not sure my English words are correct, but this should be
read as the following:
but not that I'm aware of [any other PC/SC daemon] neither [= and
not] I'm a PC/SC expert
I think that now your question
> As a PC/SC expert do you know any other compatible PC/SC daemon or
> library?
has an implicit answer: I don't know any other PC/SC daemon as I'm not
a PC/SC expert :-)
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
Footnotes:
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425511;msg=25
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
