On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:20:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 08:34:47AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 06:46:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A full build log can be found at > > > <http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=xulrunner&arch=alpha&ver=1.8.0.11-4&stamp=1178004487>. > > > > The attached patch changes xulrunner to use -Wl,--no-relax on alpha as a > > > workaround. > > > > Bug filed as 'serious' because so far xulrunner is the only package shown > > > to > > > be affected by this problem in current binutils and a workaround is > > > available. A separate bug will be filed on binutils. > > > How likely is this toolchain bug to be fixed fast ? (that's to decide if > > that can wait until I'm done packaging version 1.8.1.3) > > Not at all, I'd guess. I haven't identified the bug in binutils yet, I only > know it's triggered by use of --relax. > > I'd appreciate it if this didn't wait for a binutils fix anyway, because > xulrunner's arch: all/any interdeps mean that I can't bootstrap the current > gcj-4.1 for alpha until the current package version is built.
If you already have an alpha build using your patch, please feel free to NMU and upload it. Otherwise, I'll try to upload a patched version by tomorrow. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
