* Andreas Metzler wrote on Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 08:02:36PM CEST: > On 2007-04-19 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And libtool remembers by putting the library dependency into the > > libconvenience.la file. > > And that is exactly what goes wrong. It does not put the library > dependency in the la file, it puts the library dependency and *its* > dependencies in the la file.
D'oh. > > I sense that we are talking past each other all the time. > > I also get that feeling. Thanks for bearing with me, I feel a bit better now. OK, now that I (think I) understand the issue, I guess it's the right thing for Debian libtool (with its link_all_deplibs=no) to also not link against these indirect deplibs stemming from a convenience archive's deplibs. This feature should be specific to systems with link_all_deplibs=no, though. It can be pulled into upstream once the indirect deplibs issues are fixed (one of them being that uninstalled indirect deplibs aren't found). Cheers, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
