On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 01:05:14PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 11:57:06AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > > Anyway, any news on shared-libs for hunspell? How does OOo project
> > > think about this?
> > 
> > We have shared libs in debian, and I think upstream have them too, but Rene
> 
> Exactly.
> Alexander, you're not up-to-date :)

I never claimed to ... thats why I asked in first place ;).

> 
> $ rmadison -s unstable libhunspell-1.1-0
> libhunspell-1.1-0 |    1.1.5-5 |      unstable | alpha, ia64
> libhunspell-1.1-0 |    1.1.5-6 |      unstable | amd64, arm, hppa, i386, 
> m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
> 
> > would know better than I.
> 
> OOo upstream has still 1.1.4 as the internal copy.
> Not that it would matter. Even if they used 1.1.5 they would use their
> own internal version anyway as they do that with everything. Even with
> getopt() - yes, also on Linux...
> 

so do we still ship patches to produce shared libs for 1.1.5 or is
this feature available in unmodified upstream sources?

If the latter is true, then we can probably make a hard-case out of
the mozilla bug more easily.

 - Alexander



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to