> So just to clarify I'm looking at the same documetnation that you are > and there are no examples other than auto.home in the documentation in > there?
Correct. > > The second point is simply that /var/yp/Makefile contains entries > > for the kernel automounter for mountpoints defined by AUTO_MASTER, > > AUTO_HOME and AUTO_LOCAL. Given that the kernel automounter and amd > > provide pretty much the same servic3, it would be more consistent to provide > > the same definitions (and recipes) also for corresponding AMD_MASTER > > AMD_HOME and AMD_LOCAL, instead of only providing AMD_HOME. > > I'd prefer to stick to the documentation that am-utils provides. > Without some suggestion there's no telling how many maps people will > create or what they'll decide to call them. Ahhhhh ... Okay, I take you're point: you mean that as there were no examples in the AMD sources of use of any other map besides the amd.home map, you believe /var/yp/Makefile should *also* not use any other example - despite that the comments included in /etc/am-utils.amd.conf are somewhat misaligned with what is in /var/yp/Makefile and that /var/yp/Makefile will for sure need to be modified by anyone using AMD? Well, personally I do not agree with this; I see an opportunity to reduce the misalignment between the three packages (amd/nis and amd/autofs) within Debian and to potentially alleviate sysadmins of a little frustration and effort, but ... ... I've filed the bug report, it's out of my hands now. I leave it to you to do as you see fit. Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
