On Apr 03, Paolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, I think this patch should really make into vacation, and it's not > masqmail(8) that's broken, indeed having a default MTA install where normal > users are able to set the sender (return-path) is the broken behavior > instead (imo), and I prefer masqmail's default. Too bad. Mostly everybody disagrees, restricting -f is a stupid waste of time since users can inject mail in other ways.
> So, enabling -f for normal user by default is *the broken behaviour* IMO, > as it allows to spam/spoof too easily. Welcome to the Internet. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
