[Nicolás Lichtmaier] > In bug #386652 you removed the .la file of neon. This shows a > misunderstunding about what .la files are.
We know what .la files are. They are internal metadata maintained and used by libtool, that everyone _except_ libtool shouldn't need to care about. Talking about a .la file when you aren't libtool is a layering violation of sorts. > Please, restore that file, as the package is currently borken. I need > to work with a custom made neon package now =(. I'd suggest becoming accustomed to using either 'pkg-config --libs neon' or 'neon-config --libs', rather than 'neon-config --la-file'. Referring directly to a .la file outside libtool is not useful in Debian, if indeed it is useful anywhere.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
