On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:58 -0500, Ken Bloom wrote:
[bts usertags]
> I'm pretty sure that it used to support $EMAIL or $DEBEMAIL at some
> point, and indeed it seems to still support $EMAIL.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ bts --sendmail=/bin/cat usertags 1 =
> From: Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: usertagging 1
> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:56:19 -0500
> X-BTS-Version: 2.10.2
>
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> usertags 1 =
Having looked at this a little further, I have to admit to being
confused.
Using the exact command you quoted in your original report yields the
following:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version
2.10.2
> usertags 372608 =
Bug#372608: gs-esp launched by cupsys failes on cups PS test
pages : Error: /rangecheck in .installpagedevice
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 403803 =
Bug#403803: pine: Please switch to gettext-based debconf
templates
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 406784 =
Bug#406784: gs-esp: Fails with error on given PDF
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: .
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
which implies that bts is very much *not* ignoring the commands. In
fact, your own test above shows that the e-mail is correctly generated.
What exactly is the bug? :-)
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
