On 31.03.05 Sven-Haegar Koch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Frank K�ster wrote:
Hi, > >This is correct. However, I assumed that the file was also > >specified in woody's language.dat, which is not the case. > >Therefore it is clear that you or somebody (or something) must > >have touched language.dat (unless it is a leftover from even older > >versions of teTeX, of which I have no record of their > >language.dat). > > This seems to be the case - leftover configs from an uninstalled (but not > purged) package from very long ago. Looking at /var/lib/dpkg/status from a > backup taken in February (before the last updates/installs): > > Package: tetex-bin > Status: deinstall ok config-files > Priority: optional > Section: tex > Installed-Size: 5898 > Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <[email protected]> > Version: 1.0.6-7 > Config-Version: 1.0.6-7 > > and > > Package: tetex-base > Status: deinstall ok config-files > Priority: optional > Section: tex > Installed-Size: 27546 > Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <[email protected]> > Version: 1.0-10 > Config-Version: 1.0-10 > > This is so old that even snapshot.debian.net doesn't know about these > versions ;) > I just wonder that you have tetex-base_1.0-10 in state rc and at the same time tetex-base_2.0.2c-7 in state ii on the same machine. Do you have an explanation for that? Hilmar -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
