However, the bigger group name has 26 char only (as you can see on previous mesage)... still under 32. Should work, right?
On 3/27/07, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Fabio Pugliese Ornellas said: > > Hello, > > I have been expiriencing some gorup problems. The best way to explain, > is showing this: [snip] > As you can see, the group list differs. And the list that is actually > applying is the shortest one. So, the user have not enough rights to > work. In theory, both command should output exactly the same groups. Yes, sarge's glibc had a fixed length of 32 for group membership. There is still a fixed length in etch, but it is much bigger. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | ----------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGCaahSYIMHOpZA44RAl1CAJ0Ud2Or+g7VJBE5ZYZmCBg0jup29QCgwQDu ECqtWMqhYW9yIvia3HqZnK0= =helT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Fabio Pugliese Ornellas E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 6516089 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.geocities.com/neofpo/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
