Mark Brown wrote:
> Package: network-manager
> Version: 0.6.4-6
> Severity: important
> 
> When Network Manager is installed on a system with statically configured
> network interfaces it usually reports the system as being disconnected
> from the network, either like this:
> 
>   NetworkManager Tool
>    
>   State: disconnected
>     
>   print_devices(): didn't get a reply from NetworkManager.
>   There are no available network devices.
> 
> if there are no other interfaces or by reporting an idle interface as
> the only interface.  This causes serious problems for other tools
> attempting to use Network Manager's link state reporting to perform
> actions - the information coming out of Network Manager can only be
> trusted if Network Manager is in use and the system has a supported
> configuration.
> 
> I guess the ideal solution would be for Network Manager to have a full
> and complete understanding of all the possible network configuration
> methods and accurately reflect this status to other applications.
> That's probably wishful thinking, though.  Simpler a solution, like

Well, ifupdown is just too flexible and complex that you can't map it's
features one to one to network-manager (think of mappings, the up/down
commands, logical interfaces etc.).

Maybe we can hack up support in NM to at least understand a standard
static configuration, but that would be all that is possible.

Any device that has some complexer configuration in /e/n/i will just be
ignored by NM. Sorry to say that, but I don't see another possibility.

Cheers,
Michael

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to