Tim Baverstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 30 March 2005 3:53 pm, you wrote: > > > 'dev=/dev/cdrom' would have been confusing, but something like > > > "Impossible SCSI address [-2, -2, -2] - have you specified dev= > > > properly?" would have been good. > > > > Well, first you did call cdrecord with a _wrong_ dev= parameter and should > > not be amazed by the results. RTFM for the correct parameters..... > > Not amazed, but disappointed. RTFM is all very well, but making a program > behave helpfully in the face of improper input is matter of good taste,
Allowing a program to be useful for experimantal usagees is even better and this is what cdrecord does. In case of incorrect usagem it writes a warning that you seemed to oversee. > particularly if that input is subsequently processed in a relatively obscure > way, as in the translation from /dev/cdrom to -2,-2,-2: You already warn > about the image file being too large before trying to write it, I think. If you like to get an explanation about the obscurre device mapping in the Linux kernel, please ask the Linux kernel hackers for help. I am a victim the same way as you are.... Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily