Tim Baverstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wednesday 30 March 2005 3:53 pm, you wrote:
> > > 'dev=/dev/cdrom' would have been confusing, but something like
> > > "Impossible SCSI address [-2, -2, -2] - have you specified dev=
> > > properly?" would have been good.
> >
> > Well, first you did call cdrecord with a _wrong_ dev= parameter and should
> > not be amazed by the results. RTFM for the correct parameters.....
>
> Not amazed, but disappointed. RTFM is all very well, but making a program 
> behave helpfully in the face of improper input is matter of good taste, 

Allowing a program to be useful for experimantal usagees is even better and this
is what cdrecord does. In case of incorrect usagem it writes a warning that you
seemed to oversee.

> particularly if that input is subsequently processed in a relatively obscure 
> way, as in the translation from /dev/cdrom to -2,-2,-2: You already warn 
> about the image file being too large before trying to write it, I think.

If you like to get an explanation about the obscurre device mapping in the
Linux kernel, please ask the Linux kernel hackers for help.
I am a victim the same way as you are....


Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]                (uni)  
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]        (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily

Reply via email to