On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 02:16:19PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > On 05-Mar-31 12:59, Michael Koch wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:26:46PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > > If gcc-3.3 is the default compiler, gcj will point to gcj-3.3 > > > and libgcj-dev will point to libgcj4-dev. > > > If gcc-4.0 is the default compiler, gcj will point to gcj-4.0 > > > and libgcj-dev will point to libgcj6-dev. > > > The gcc-defaults package will take care of this. > > > > There are problems when libgcj-dev and gcc/g++ don't match. So updating > > gcj/libgcj-dev to the same version is not enough. > > > > > Currently the ppc64 architecture uses gcc-4.0 as the default compiler > > > while the other architectures still use gcc-3.3. > > > > What are the defaults for cpp, gcc and g++ on ppc64 ? If they point to > > cpp-4.0, gcc-4.0 and g++-4.0 you just had lack. > > Those are the defaults on ppc64, yes. > > I still do not understand what you mean. Why should replacing > 'libgcj4-dev' with 'libgcj-dev' break anything? > > The gcc-defaults package will take care that the default gcc/g++, gcj > and libgcj-dev versions work together. What is wrong with that?
I doubt that gcc-defaults really takes care of this. I will apply your patch with next upload, if I ever find a sponsor who is willing to sponsor this chaotic package again. But I expect it o be broken when we change the defaults. Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
