Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Package: dtc > Severity: wishlist > > I think the README.Debian of your package is quite offensive to the > policy. There is very good reasons for a package beeing absolutely > banned from modifying another one conffiles. You may not like it, you > can discuss it, but I find quite discutable the fact to express it like > that in the README.Debian. It confuses users.
Hi! The goal was not to be offensive, but to tell that there was nothing to do about it, it's like that and that's all. I know there are good reasons, and I understand them. This doesn't make me feel better knowing the reasons. I'm going to change it, but I think it's a bit silly to file a bug against my package for so few. A quick message to my mail would have been enough, I think. I'll have to add an entry to the changelog, check it's marked as done, people will see it publicly and notice it, and might think you are right, and I'm so bad, etc. Tell you the truth, I do find offensive that you take it so bad that you have to file a bug against it. Do you realise how much effort I've put in being policy compliant so nobody complains about it anymore? Did you understand why I wrote this, and what's the goal of our control panel? It's goal is to configure things, and the policy forbids to do so. Of course, I don't like the policy because I believe it's too restrictive to accept an APP like ours, I think it's understandable. Thomas P.S: Please don't flame me back in a reply, I'm going to change it anyway, and I don't want you take this reply as bad as the text in the README.Debian... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
