Mike Hommey, le Thu 01 Mar 2007 07:37:16 +0100, a écrit : > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 01:19:25AM +0100, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Mike Hommey, le Sun 25 Feb 2007 20:56:28 +0100, a écrit : > > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 04:39:51AM +0100, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > + char path[strlen(file) + strlen(DBM_SUFFIX) + 1]; > > > > > > Are these kind of constructs really portable ? > > > > Since C99, yes. > > Which means it's probably not likely to be applied in this form upstream...
Well, 1999 is a bit far behind, will XUL really be run on old systems that don't accept it? (recent IBM's xlc, HP-UX's cc, SUN's cc, Intel's icc, and even old gcc 2.95 accept it).
