On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 22:23 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Agustin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-01 11:06]: > > > Thijs, did you try my last patch (using ispell-wrapper) to > > plugins/squirrelspell/sqspell_config.php? If working I am more in favour of > > something like that since it would require no changes in > > dictionaries-common. > > I thought that Thijs was trying to avoid the extra call to a Perl script > from PHP. Anyway, I agree that a solution that does not require changes in > dictionaries-common is better.
Indeed - my concern is that because a web application is in principle stateless, I would need to fork a perl call on every page load of the spell checker, which seems a bit overkill to me. I could try to cache the result into the user's session though, if you prefer that. However, since dictionaries-common already seems to be supplying data for specific applications, what's the drawback of doing that for one extra specific application? Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
