(bug 260141 : two suggestions for exim4 config screens : rewrite the templates for having them integrate more easily in the 2nd stage installs by making clear they are about configuring the mail system....and change the priority of the exim4 configuration question from critical to high)
> > Do these suggestions still apply? It is adviseable to follow them at > > this stage of Release? > > May I remind? Well, apologies for the lack of answers. The mail probably felt into a mini black hole in my head... About the templates rewording, this is definitely post-sarge as it seems too late for me to have a chance getting translations synced again (last time, it took me near 3 weeks to be sure getting the 30+ languages completed). The priority change could maybe happen now. I see no harm doing it but this probably needs some agreement from the d-i team (OK, I'm part of it...but Frans and/or Joey, or others, can bring more input). For D-i people, the suggestion was: > > I'm also wondering whether the exim4/dc_eximconfig_configtype could be > > "high" priority only. After all, the default "no configuration" does not > > break the system....This would save one question on "critical" priority > > installs, which will be anyway used in very special cases, where full > > automation and less user interaction is very important. This question has a critical priority currently. So, it adds one screen to critical priority installs, while the default value is indeed correct and does not break the system, as said.
