On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:33:59 +0100, "Raphael Hertzog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Christoph Berg wrote: > > > keyword you won't receive discussions concerning bug reports. > > > > I agree that the "done" mails from the BTS are quite boring as they > > only repeat the initial mail. > > That's because most of the -done mails are generated by dak. But there > are also manual -done mails which have valuable information in that case. > We could special case based on some dak headers but I don't think it's > worth the pain.
Any chance then you could call that category "bts-dak" or something, and at least make it something one could opt out from separately from the other stuff? Perhaps the dak maintainer could cooperate to make this less painful to code? I don't want to unsubscribe from the current "bts", I just want to avoid getting large amounts of completely predictable messages. I know how to filter my mail, but I'm troubled by the approach to defer the issue to the users instead of adapting an existing mechanism (the pts keywords) to make it go away entirely. /* era */ -- If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
