On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Asheesh Laroia wrote:

> Since the pine package no longer builds a pico package, it should be okay to
> rename it to "pico", yes?

That's how I think it should be named, yes.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to