On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:34:13PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 08:45:38AM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > > > > Note that the kernel change makes some corner use cases impossible > > > > without > > > > some additional userspace changes to samba. Upstream has agreed to > > > > accept > > > > these patches[1], but I don't know if they've been committed yet. > > > > Even if it's still a case that all server-side perms are ignored, dropping > > > this patch is still an improvement for users wanting symlink support, > > > apparently. So I agree with dropping it, as long as we're sure the kernel > > > changes are in place. > > > Cool. What's the samba team's opinion of the userspace patches going into > > etch/sarge? Here's a port of the patch that applies to both etch and > > sarge: > > The patch looks reasonable to me. Has it been tested?
for a few test cases, yes -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
