Le mardi 23 janvier 2007 à 21:03 +0100, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> Julien Valroff wrote:
> > After more thinking, even with packages in sync, the bug is still valid,
> > as 2.6.18+1.3.0~pre9-10 >> 1.3.0~pre9-10+2.6.18-8
> 
> yes, but this will not be fixed, see #402811.

Terribly sorry, I haven't found this previous bug report before
submitting mine.

However, I am not sure to understand why this situation seems to be
acceptable for you, as it makes using kqemu-source useless, except by
holding kqemu-modules from upgrade.

I agree that this situation does only happen in case the stock kernel is
used in conjunction with kqemu-source, which is not the majority of its
use, but still inconsistent.

Cheers,
Julien


Reply via email to