> > Two days ago, I sent you a notice announcing my intent to upload > > a NMU of your package to fix its l10n issues. > > Sorry ... I never recieved you announcement, I was also searching trough the > server logs, but I cant find any reject of the servers. Where did you send > your mail?
To [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is what I usually use. The first is supposed to reach the person listed in "Maintainer:" while the latter reaches the people subscribed to the PTS (which usually is adapted for team-maintained packages). This is unfortunately not the first time I see this happen and maintainers mentioning that the mail didn't reach them...:-| > > > I have uploaded this NMU to DELAYED/0-DAY (which means an immediate > > upload). > > The question which comes to my mind: Why this urgency for a package, which > isn't in etch and in archive since ~ 6 weeks? Okay .. I should have set the > bug to 'pending' since its allready in my svn, but I was waiting if there are Well, I did not noticed that the package wasn't in etch until I uploaded it, so theoretically the urgency wasn't that high. On the other hand, I'm trying to bring French debconf translations to 100% and ipplan was on the radar..:-) Sorry for the little mess up. I usually suggest maintainers to upload packages when they can, for l10n updates, unless they specifically call for new translations. Of course, for packages like yours which aren't in testing, this is probably less "urgent" as you mentioned but, again, I didn't notice until then.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
