Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Um, it's not; the package isn't "unusable" for amd64 users, it simply > doesn't exist on amd64.
> That should be an 'important' bug AFAICS. My bad. I thought that failing to support a supported arch on which it should build and work was grave, but hadn't run into this specific situation before. (I should have given more weight to the fact that it hadn't previously built on that arch as well.) -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
