Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 04:00:20 +0100 > Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Package: uswsusp >> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6 >> Severity: wishlist >> >> There is a new upstream release 0.5 available at suspend.sf.net. >> I've been using it successfully for some time now. >> Maybe an official 0.5 release would be a better choice for etch than a >> 0.3 release from CVS? > > The diff between the CVS snapshot and 0.5 is not that big. Actually, I > didn't want to wait for the release of 0.5 because we would have missed > etch. > I agree that having 0.5 would have been better for clarity, but > uploading a new source package for etch is now really to late, don't > you think?
Why not upload 0.5 to unstable and see if it works fine. If it does, you you could request a freeze exception. If not and you have to upload fixes for 0.3~cvs20060928, t-p-u could be used. Cheers, Michael P.S.: What's the status of pm-utils? As comaintainer of hal I'd like to test hal 0.5.9 which uses pm-utils as backend. With more and more distros switching to pm-utils (Fedora/Redhat, Suse and Mandriva), I'd say it would be a good idea to get on board and participate in the developement of pm-utils. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
