Hi Ben, Ben Klang wrote: > Sorry if I went about this the wrong way. I noticed that there were a three > bugs outstanding (some over a year old) and so I was attempting to report > that the package was apparently orphaned. I do have an updated package which > I want to submit. Perhaps you can steer me back in the right direction. > > Igor: If you're getting these emails would you let me know if you're > planning > on updating the package? > > I apologize for any inconvenience caused by this erroneous action. > /BAK/
I took over ldap2dns just in order to keep it in Debian. I checked the new upstream version some time ago but haven't had the time to create a new package for it since iirc it didn't work cleanly with my old LDAP records¹ and I couldn't figure out what the problem was. I'd say go ahead and take over the package (co-maintainership is fine too), but keep in mind, that you'd need to provide an upgrade procedure for older versions (see ¹). Cheers, Igor ¹: it wrote the tinydns records just fine, but $? was always 1
