On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 05:56:39PM -0300, Caio Begotti wrote:
> On Friday 19 May 2006 17:34, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > Though still I'd like to know what upstream thinks about the name of the
> > language. I asked on #asterisk-dev and was suggested to use "pt_br"
> > rather than "br". The ISO639-1 language name "br" is Breton, BTW.
>
> I don't have any idea why it's "br" not pt_br or even pt_BR (which would
> probably be even more correct, IMHO). It's just is. All "br" references comes
> from the following files that makes me think it's pretty fine, although I
> don't understand why the 639-1 name, not 8859-1:
>
> /etc/asterisk/indications.conf:country=br
> /etc/asterisk/sip.conf:language=br
> /etc/asterisk/unicall.conf:language=br
> /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf:language=br
>
> No other file has "br" set up and since it's a channel configuration, I think
> it's a bug in both zapata.conf and unicall.conf, not in this patch, right?
>
> Sorry if I got it wrong, maybe I just missed something, Tzafrir :-)
>
> Cheers!
changelog of 1:1.2.9.1.dfsg-1:
brazilian_syntax.dpatch (using "pt_BR")
Is that OK>
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
