On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:14:45 -0500
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:02:41AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Justin,
> > 
> > I am confused. You wrote:
> > 
> > >> When do you expect it to be forwarded upstream?
> > > Donno; that's up to the maintainer.  If you like, you can do it
> > > yourself.  You should Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in your message,
> > > which will get your message into the bts and also mark the bug as
> > > "forwarded" to whoever is in the To: field.
> > 
> > Looking in http://bugs.debian.org/295435 it says
> > 
> >   Maintainer for sylpheed is Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ...
> > 
> > which agrees with you saying that you are not the maintainer.
> Right:)
> 
> > You suggest I do something "funny" to ensure the maintainer gets the
> > message? Or, would that forward the bug upstream (all of it, or just
> > the message I am sending), bypassing the lazy maintainer?
> No; people have different interpretations about what the maintainer of
> a package is supposed to do, and what they are expected to do.
> 
> Some maintainers dislike when users report upstream bugs to the debian
> BTS, because then they have to forward the bugs upstream, and fumble
> with a second BTS.  Or they simply don't do that, and the bugs just
> bitrot.
> 
> Other maintainers don't have so many bugs to worry about, and don't
> mind forwarding the bugs.

  And others happen to have a life with situations where free time drops
nearly to zero sometimes. But I guess is easier to think they're lazy.
 
> Since I can confirm that the problem is the "upstream" tarball, and
> not the Debian packaging, I suggested that you might forward the bug
> yourself.

  I'd better suggest to upgrade to a newer version. Given upstream is
currently focused on developing the 2.0 version and the availability of
much newer versions ported to woody, I don't think upstream is gonna take
care of this bug.
 
> (I'm assuming that Ricardo won't mind; correct me if I'm wrong.
> Most people aren't protective of their bugs, but conventionally only
> the submitter or the maintainer actually closes a bug).

  I don't mind at all, if the actions are correct and justified :)
 
> > If you are not the maintainer, how did you get to "tag" this bug:
> > could I have done so myself?
> Yup.  http://bugs.debian.org/ tells you all about it.  The BTS is
> opened for you to submit, view, or even manipulate bugs.

  regards,
-- 
  Ricardo Mones Lastra - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Centro de Inteligencia Artificial, Universidad de Oviedo en Gijon
  33271 Asturias, SPAIN. - http://www.aic.uniovi.es/mones


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to