At Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:59:56 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:11:35 +0100,
> Martin Thorsen Ranang wrote:
> > I didn't find this bug in the archive.
> >
> > I tried to upgrade some packages using the following command:
> > apt-get -t experimental upgrade
> > [...]
> > The following packages will be upgraded:
> > dpkg dpkg-dev dselect ghc6-doc glibc-doc libc6 libc6-dev libc6-i686
> > libmcrypt-dev libmcrypt4 libomniorb4 libomnithread3 librpm4 libsablevm1
> > libsvn-core-perl libsvn0 locales mcrypt omniorb4 reportbug rpm sablevm
> > scrabble sox udev vim vim-common vim-doc vim-gnome
> > 29 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 27 not upgraded.
> > [...]
> ...
> > Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 (using .../libc6_2.3.4-1_i386.deb)
> > ...
> > Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
> > Setting up libc6 (2.3.4-1) ...
> > dpkg: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: symbol
> > _dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file
> > ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference
>
> Ah, OK, I could see why this bug was produced - it's happenned when we
> already installed the previous version of libc6-i686 2.3.4.ds1, and we
> try to install new libc6 2.3.4.
Note that, how to fix this problem when you're trapped in:
* Fix the current problem either (a) or (b):
(a) Touch /etc/ld.so.nohwcap which has "i686" line.
(b) Remove /lib/tls, or move /lib/tls to other name.
* Reinstall new libc6 package. Then install libc6-i686 package.
When you don't install libc6, and you try to install new libc6:
* invoke: dpkg --force-depends -i libc6_2.3.4-1_i386.deb \
libc6-i686_2.3.4-1_i386.deb
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
