On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 12:58:03PM -0600, Kevin Glynn wrote: > Justin, > > It is not clear to me what the intent of this reopening/retitling is. > > Do you mean that the fuller patch attached to this report should be > applied? If so, then I would like to see that too. I am planning to > rewrite the patch against 2.0.8.2 and add it to the remaining open > bugs. However, it was a struggle to find someone to NMU 2.0.8.2 which > was limited to closing the severity important report. I was thinking > that I could push it again post-etch. > > Or is there still an aspect of this report that is still open to do > with fixing apt-file's output? I can't see what that would be. I just didn't want to see your patch get lost in a closed bug.
Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
