Hi
I fear that the log you give does not give the basic reason
for the failure.
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:27:01 +0100, "Julien Danjou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/sbcl-0.9.18.0/contrib/sb-sprof'
> > Failed contribs:
> > asdf-install
> > sb-aclrepl
> > sb-bsd-sockets
> > sb-cltl2
> > sb-grovel
> > sb-md5
> > sb-posix
> > sb-rotate-byte
> > sb-rt
> > sb-simple-streams
This is the main cause of the documentation failure later on.
In the backtrace of
> > unhandled SB-INT:SIMPLE-FILE-ERROR in thread #<SB-THREAD:THREAD "initial
> > thread" {A685791}>:
> > The file "/nonexistent/" does not exist.
> >
we find:
> > 7: ((LAMBDA
> > (SB-PCL::.PV-CELL. SB-PCL::.NEXT-METHOD-CALL. SB-PCL::.ARG0.
> > SB-PCL::.ARG1.))
> > #<unavailable argument>
> > #<unavailable argument>
> > #<ASDF:LOAD-OP NIL {A884029}>
> > #<ASDF:SYSTEM "sb-rotate-byte" {A7D83D9}>)
> > 8: ((LAMBDA ()))
> > 9: (SB-C::%WITH-COMPILATION-UNIT #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA #) {A896CF5}>)
> > 10: (ASDF:OPERATE ASDF:LOAD-OP :SB-MD5)
> > 11: (ASDF::MODULE-PROVIDE-ASDF :SB-MD5)
So it needs sb-md5 and sb-rotate-byte. These modules normally build
without any
known problem, but the logs of the building is not included. Do you have
them?
Groetjes, Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
