Hi, On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 01:28:40AM +1100, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > My mail or the BTS must be lagging somewhat. Forgive me if I repeat > myself.
I have seen such problems as well, so I guess it's not your e-mail. > >Sure, agreed; it's certainly a bug, it just doesn't seem to break anything. > > No, it's not a bug. It's intentional. Please see the package > description. I read it afterwards and closed that bug I had opened. Sorry for the inflated bug report. Anyway, why keep an empty package on all those architecture. Why not let perl-base provide libperl5.8 and kill libperl5.8 on those architectures. Or have libperl5.8 always contain the actual shared library and have perl-base depend on libperl5.8 (that would have to be essntial: yes) on those architectures? Cheers, Nicolas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
