(CCing #396655, as the FTBFS got filed there)
Hi,
thanks for the quick reply.
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:25:10AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> After the patches are applied, I can see that
> coreutils-5.97/src/copy.h has the member preserve_security_context in
> struct cp_options, inside a WITH_SELINUX guard.. Looking through
> cp.c, I can see that preserve_security_context is mentioned on lines:
> 248, 1143, 1540, 1681, and 1824 -- and every single time it is inside
> a WITH_SELINUX guard!
AFAICT it is also mentioned on line 911, and is not guarded there:
(starting at line 890)
#ifdef WITH_SELINUX
while ((c = getopt_long (argc, argv, "abcdfHilLprst:uvxPRS:TZ:",
#else
while ((c = getopt_long (argc, argv, "abdfHilLprst:uvxPRS:T",
#endif
long_opts, NULL))
!= -1)
{
switch (c)
{
[...]
case 'a': /* Like -dpPRc. */
[...]
x.preserve_security_context = true; // line 911
[...]
#ifdef WITH_SELINUX
(ending on line 986)
Line 911 is also where gcc claims the culprit lies:
cp.c:911: error: 'struct cp_options' has no member named
'preserve_security_context'
> So why is the build breaking for you? Are you compiling with
> WITH_SELINUX defined?
--enable-selinux is not being passed to ./configure at least, the only
mention of selinux or SELINUX in config.log is the following line:
LIB_SELINUX=''
> Can you provide full logs?
The full log is at
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=coreutils&ver=5.97-5.1&arch=hurd-i386&stamp=1161863245&file=log&as=raw
cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
